Subject: Re: 512x384 displays
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com>
From: Jude Giampaolo <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/08/2000 08:09:05
At 11:48 PM +0000 10/7/00, email@example.com wrote:
> TM> Essentially, it was a cheap way of fitting an 8-bit
> > display in only 256k of vram.
>Worked too =o) Thinking about it though, with 256Kb of
>display memory you could do 640 x 400 in 256 colours. It
>might have added to the cost of the monitor though.
That option was avaliable as well on the LC. You could drive 640x480x16 on
a stock LC, but not with the 12" monitor from Apple. You needed the 13"
http://prozac.eeap.cwru.edu/jude/ "Corn Nog?"