On Mon, 22 May 2000, Christos Zoulas wrote:

> Oh, everyone has the right to his own opinion. And if there is enough
> momentum, I will not oppose the change. It is just my opinion, that tcsh
> is too much of a pig, and it is broken in many ways the same way that
> csh is. The fact that csh is smaller and less complex makes it more
> manageable. Being the author of tcsh does not add any more or less
> value to that opinion.

	Would there be strong resistance to adding commandline editing to
	csh - presumably using the same editline library as used in sh?

		David/absolute
				       -- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --