Subject: Re: IP-NAT? NOT!
To: Christopher P. Gill <cpg@scs.howard.edu>
From: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@nas.nasa.gov>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 08/09/1999 17:06:35
On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Christopher P. Gill wrote:

> I'm hoping that those of you with functioning IP-NAT setups can give me a
> hand.  I'm running NetBSD 1.4 GENERIC kernel on a Quadra 800 40/500+520.
> When this is working, I'll have my sn0 Etherface connected to my ADSL
> modem/bridge, and my ae0 Etherface (Asante' MacCon) to the uplink port of 
> my local network hub.

That sounds wrong. Were you abole to get the machines talking to the ae0
at all with that setup?

Usually the "uplink" port is intended to connect to another hub. Even if
it's acting as a router, the ae0 interface should be connected to a normal
hub port.

I know you mentioned some appletalk services on ae0 - did they work with
ae0 on the uplink port?

Take care,

Bill