David A. Gatwood wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Colin Wood wrote:
> 
> > David A. Gatwood wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, Ken Nakata wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I do.  Singer is Apple's code name, but it's actually a codec chip
> > > > developed and sold by another company (I think the company was called
> > > > ITT or something).  I downloaded the PDF datasheet off the Net a while
> > > > ago, and I hope it's still buried somewhere in one of my HFS
> > > > partitions.  I'll try to get and post the URL when I get home or I
> > > > could directly send the PDF to you if you want (provided that I didn't
> > > > lose it when my 2G drive died on me).
> > > 
> > > If you find it, send me a copy.  MkLinux would love to have sound working
> > > on the Performa 52/53/62/63xx machines (once we actually figure out why
> > > they're not booting).
> > 
> > does they not use the same hardware as in the 6100/7100/8100-series?
> > there are docs on that...
> 
> The Singer might be the chip in the x100's rather than the Performas.  I'm
> a little fuzzy.  The Performas (well, some of them are called PowerMacs,
> but the 52/53/62/63...), though, are basically Quadras with a PPC card,
> so....  ;-)

the singer is only in the AV mac's.  the x100's use the AWACS chip.  if
the performas really are quadras, perhaps they use EASC's?  if so, i can
tell you how they work, sort of :-)

later.

colin