John Pannell wrote:

> 
> Perhaps "routed" is your problem... anyone else have any guesses?
> 

No 'routed'. I'm wondering if a) this is a valid error about what is
actually going on, and b) if it wouldn't be possible to make the
buffer bigger as a workaround?

Still looking..

-- 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ John Fulmer               |  "UNIX was not designed to stop     +
+ Linux, security,          |   you from doing stupid things,     +
+ and paranoia....Ahhh...   |   because that would also stop you  +
+                           |   from doing clever things."        +
+ jfulmer@appin.ml.org      |                      --Doug Gwyn    +
+                           |     (I gotta check my sources..)    +
+    "The opinions contained may not reflect those of anyone.."   +
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++