Hmm - maybe its a bug in the MacOS side mkfs?
	Could someone with a spare disk test it out to see if using
	MacOS side mkfs gives the problem?

		David/absolute

                  -=- Why _do_ we crucify ourselves?  -=-

On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, NetBSD wrote:

> my 2 cents ;-)
> 
> I had a similar experience running 1.3 (Generic). I ran newfs on every
> partition and successfully have df reporting what seems like a more
> plausible report for multiple partitions
> / 	/usr	/var 	/home
> 
> man newfs and see if it has any appeal for you, if so it could be a way to
> fix things. It worked for me
> 
> ------------------- reply seperator ---------------------------
> 
> Chris wrote:
> 
> >
> >The only thing I haven't been able to figure out is why df is lying to me.
> >
> >This is the output I get when I type df:
> >
> >Filesystem  1K-blocks     Used    Avail Capacity  Mounted on
> >/dev/sd0a       49391    11670    32781    26%    /
> >/dev/sd0g      247262   192880    29655    87%    /usr
> >/dev/sd0d       97677     1484    86425     2%    /var
> >/dev/sd0f      282000   102551   151249    40%    /home
> >/dev/sd0h      346189   282009    29561    91%    /tmp
> >kernfs              1        1        0   100%    /kern
> >procfs              4        4        0   100%    /proc
> >
> >Next is the output from disklabel, and the actual partition sizes as I
> >created them. The sectors are 512k, so divide by 2 to compare with the
> >numbers above. The one that worries me the most is /tmp , which should
> >be 66510 kbytes, but instead is showing up as 346189, with only 29561
> >free. Yet du says /tmp is only using 9 blocks...
> >
> >8 partitions:
> >#      size   offset      fstype   [fsize bsize   cpg]
> >a:   102400   122976      4.2BSD        0     0     0   # (Cyl.  316*- 580*)
> >b:   122880       96        swap                        # (Cyl.    0*- 316*)
> >c:  1431760        0      unused        0     0         # (Cyl.    0 - 3690*)
> >d:   202300   634976      4.2BSD        0     0     0   # (Cyl. 1636*- 2157*)
> >e:    79984  1351776         HFS                        # (Cyl. 3483*- 3690*)
> >f:   381480   837276      4.2BSD        0     0     0   # (Cyl. 2157*- 3141*)
> >g:   409600   225376      4.2BSD        0     0     0   # (Cyl.  580*- 1636*)
> >h:   133020  1218756      4.2BSD        0     0     0   # (Cyl. 3141*- 3483*)
> >
> >Can anybody tell me why df is saying such strange things about the size and
> >capacity of the partitions? I'm running NetBSD-1.3.3-generic.
> 
> 
>