Subject: Re: df doesn't agree with me...
To: None <port-mac68k@netbsd.org>
From: NetBSD <netbsd@bvjtoday.co.jp>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 02/17/1999 19:27:29
my 2 cents ;-)
I had a similar experience running 1.3 (Generic). I ran newfs on every
partition and successfully have df reporting what seems like a more
plausible report for multiple partitions
/ /usr /var /home
man newfs and see if it has any appeal for you, if so it could be a way to
fix things. It worked for me
------------------- reply seperator ---------------------------
Chris wrote:
>
>The only thing I haven't been able to figure out is why df is lying to me.
>
>This is the output I get when I type df:
>
>Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
>/dev/sd0a 49391 11670 32781 26% /
>/dev/sd0g 247262 192880 29655 87% /usr
>/dev/sd0d 97677 1484 86425 2% /var
>/dev/sd0f 282000 102551 151249 40% /home
>/dev/sd0h 346189 282009 29561 91% /tmp
>kernfs 1 1 0 100% /kern
>procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc
>
>Next is the output from disklabel, and the actual partition sizes as I
>created them. The sectors are 512k, so divide by 2 to compare with the
>numbers above. The one that worries me the most is /tmp , which should
>be 66510 kbytes, but instead is showing up as 346189, with only 29561
>free. Yet du says /tmp is only using 9 blocks...
>
>8 partitions:
># size offset fstype [fsize bsize cpg]
>a: 102400 122976 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 316*- 580*)
>b: 122880 96 swap # (Cyl. 0*- 316*)
>c: 1431760 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - 3690*)
>d: 202300 634976 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 1636*- 2157*)
>e: 79984 1351776 HFS # (Cyl. 3483*- 3690*)
>f: 381480 837276 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 2157*- 3141*)
>g: 409600 225376 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 580*- 1636*)
>h: 133020 1218756 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 3141*- 3483*)
>
>Can anybody tell me why df is saying such strange things about the size and
>capacity of the partitions? I'm running NetBSD-1.3.3-generic.