Subject: Re: Package System?
To: None <port-mac68k@netbsd.org>
From: Jeff Woolley <Jeff.R.Woolley-1@tc.umn.edu>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 08/27/1998 19:46:11
>On Thu, 27 Aug 98 13:33:44 -0600, Jeff Woolley wrote:
>>
>> I'm running NetBSD 1.3 (GENERIC) #56 on a SE/30 with 32MB RAM.
>>
>> What is the best way to install software? I want to get GhostScript
>> working with my HP Desk Writer.
>
>I'm not sure if HP DW driver's built in, but you could install the GS
>precompiled binary pkg. It is found at:
>
>ftp://ftp.NetBSD.ORG/pub/NetBSD/packages/1.3.2/m68k/All/ghostscript-5.10.tgz
>
>You can directly install it by specifying this URL as the argument to
>pkg_add command. Ur, wait. Since you're running 1.3, this binary
>might have trouble running on your system though I'm not sure it will.
Is the pkg_add command different than using the pkgsrc stuff, i.e., going
to the directory that the package is in (cd
/usr/pkgsrc/print/ghostscript5) and typing make. This downloaded other
packages/libs that where need for ghostscript. I don't think it was a
binary, since it was compiling it.
How hard is it to upgrade to 1.3.2?
>> In an attempt to install GhostScript I type
>>
>> cd /usr/pkgsrc/print/ghostscript5
>> make
>>
>> After downloading, while the script is extracting some of the files, I
>> get the following
>>
>> gzip: stdout: Broken pipe
>> /usr/bin/tar: child returned status 1
>>
>> Was something not extracted properly?
>
>Quite likely, yes. It may be safer to redownload the distfile.
>
>> During the compile of GhostScript, the machine crashed.
>>
>> panic: cleaned vnode isn't stopped at _Debugger+0x6: unlk a6
>> db>trace
>> _Debugger(0,8b7ccc,3f6b4,3f59c,3f58e) + 6
>> _panic(3f58e,6c43380,0,408) + 40
>> _getnewvnode(1,6c0ee00,6bf9200,8b7d0c) + e0
>> _ffs_vget(6c0ee00,2443,8b7d90) 60
>> _ufs_lookup(8b7e00) a46
>> _lookup(8b7e9c) + 23e
>> _namei(8b7e9c) + 152
>> _sys___lstat13(6c3a200,8b7f88,8b7f80) + 2c
>> _syscall(118) + 13e
>> _trap0() + e
>> db>
>>
>> What happened?
>
>I'm not sure but this is weird... The panic message isn't even
>complete. However, if fsck after reboot finds nothing wrong with your
>filesystem, it's probably OK.
I copied it from the screen, but that's all that was there.
It stopped in single user and said run fsck_ffs manually. I did, and
answered yes for everything that was messed up.
__
Jeff