Subject: Re: Network speed question...
To: <>
From: None <erich@wrq.com>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 08/06/1998 09:36:41
Thanks for responding,
I'll try "big" file transfers to /dev/null from around the subnet and
see how fast they go. From the sound of it, 300KB/sec would be fast
enough for the job (I'm really getting way too anal about this...).
Also, what is ttcp?
I'm curious about another thing. I have a MacCon Nubus NIC too. The
docs say that it has 64KB memory. The kernel reported it as only 32
KB. Is that a kernel limitation?
Thanks!
Eric Holcomb
___________________________________ $BJV?.(J _______________________________________
$B7oL>(J: Re: Network speed question...
$BAw?.<T(J: briggs (briggs@canolog.ninthwonder.com) at internet
$BF|IU(J: 98/08/05 20:14
> That is exactly what you should get.
> IIci 25Mhz 030 w/MacCon NuBus-A , 32KB memory (NetBSD 1.3)
> ping from Cyrix233MX -> IIci ~(5.5-6.3)ms
> Max thruput to a Cyrix233MX w/ISA 10BaseT 3COM NIC (NetBSD
> 1.3.2)
> ftp> get ghostscript-5.10.tgz
Actually, you should probably try:
ftp> get ghostscript-5.10.tgz /dev/null
to get the network speed, although ttcp is better... ;-)
> 3594574 bytes received in 11.75 seconds (298.83 KB/s)
~300KB/s sounds a lot like the disk speed. I don't know if the
network speed is much higher, though. There's a lot of overhead
in handling the nubus interrupts--I don't know how much room for
improvement there is, or how much improving the interrupt
overhead would improve the network performance.
-allen
--
Allen Briggs - briggs@ninthwonder.com