On Sat, 7 Feb 1998, Bill Studenmund wrote:

> The stuff on puma is, AFAIK, the latest. Paul and I haven't touched it in
> years.
> 
> That code base would be a good educational reference, but I think Paul
> Hargrove's macfs would be a better port. It'll write, and someone is
> adding HFS+ support to it. It's only problem is it was not at all designed
> to be used in anything other than Linux; there's no MacFS/UnixFS boundry
> layer.

That was the plan... I'm not familiar at all with the way BSD deals with
filesystems, so the old hfsfs code would be a means of figuring out the
NetBSD vfs layer (is that the right term?).  I'll dl both of those and
have a look.


David

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/CC/FA/H/L/MC/M/MU/PA/TW d-@ s:>- a-- C++++>$ UBLAS*++++>$
P+?>$ L+++>$ !E--- W+++>$ N++(+++)>+++$ !o? K-? !w--- !O
M++>$ !V-- PS+>$ !PE- Y+>$ PGP+>$ t+++>$ 5+>++++$ !X- !R tv+>$
b++>$ !DI !D- G++(+++)>$ e>++++ h--! r--- !y-
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------