Subject: Re: Modem probs/other unix's?
To: wb2oyc <WB2OYC@BELLATLANTIC.NET>
From: Michael R Zucca <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/17/1997 15:23:15
> Yeah, but its worth checking from time to time. They have been making
> good progress lately, except that right now their main web site is down
> for a major overhaul or something....
Yeah, they certainly have made some progress and they certainly are having
constant web problems.
> To be very frank about it I'm looking forward to giving it a try.
> Mainly because they are "attempting" to do it all, by not relying
> on the Mac's ROMs at all. From my perspective (I'd love to here
> comment from those of you that are more expert in this) that would
> also make their chances of success very, very difficult, what with
> the dirth of info on the internals of the various models.
Yep. And unfortunately they are going to have to reproduce a great deal
of our work from scratch. Though that's not too bad since a fresh
perspective may be a good thing. Our code is quite old.
To give them a hand I'm going to try and document what I'm doing separately
so that people with licensing problems can use my info. That should be
quite a boost as they seem to have early alpha versions of SCSI, serial,
and ADB for the II's.
> The reason its interesting to me is this: shouldn't their port be
> able to provide better performance from a given machine, since they
> won't be utilizing any ROM'd code, or is that wrong? If its wrong,
> why is that the case?
To some degree but not because of the ROM code. We only use ROM code in a
very few places: optionally on ADB and in Paul's SLOTMAN code. The rest is
all ROM-free code. However, you'll probably find that Linux code is a bit
faster in some areas because the Linux folks' primary concern is speed
over portability. So you'll see lots of C speed stuff like heavy use of
macros and speed hacks all over the place.