On Mon, 17 Nov 1997, Henry B. Hotz wrote:

> >>Shouldn't "rm ./-axl" also work? (provided it's in the current directory)
> >
> 
> Also there are variations on "rm ?axl" which should work.  In these cases
> it is wise to do an "ls ?axl" to make sure you don't delete something else
> my accident.
> 
	As mentioned before - anything that results in 'rm -axl' being
	executed will not work.

		David/abs

   _.oXo._   Too complex to explain, too simplistic to admit.   _.oXo._