xiamin wrote:

> On Sun, 20 Jul 1997, Colin Wood wrote:
>  Yes, ae0 is probably the card, unless you have a SONIC-based card, in
> > which case, sn1 will be the card.
> > Hmmm...I assume that ae0 does show up in the autoconf messages at boot
> > time?  If so, it might be that ifconfig is broken.  Do you have an
> > sn1 show up at boot instead?  Perhaps you should file a bug with send-pr?
> > Can anyone else verify such behavior??
> > 
> In dmesg there is no mention of ae0 or sn1...it only mentions sn0. Is 
> this a bad sign?

Maybe, is there any mention of an unconfigured card during the nubus
section of the autoconfiguration?  There should be at least a mention of
cards that are not being configured...if not, this is definitely a bug of
some sort.

Later.

Colin

P.S.  What version of NetBSD are you running?