Subject: Re: amd
To: None <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
From: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@loki.stanford.edu>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 07/04/1997 14:54:59
> 
> On Fri, 4 Jul 1997 17:59:29 -0400 (EDT) 
>  "Steven N. Hirsch" <shirsch@ibm.net> wrote:
> 
>  > So I've learned!  Urk.  I had it in my head that Apple were smarter than
>  > that by the time the SE/30 was designed.  Presumably, later vintage M68K
>  > Macs had more sophisticated hardware?

I think the idea of doing it all in software, which dated to the late
70's and the Apple II, still held firm. Unfortunately.

> ...not really :-)  Well, there was one that had DMA, I think (IIvx?),
> and the Quadras have an NCR53c9x, but I don't think all of them have
> DMA engines... maybe only the AV models?  Dunno.. I'm not really a Mac
> expert :-)

The IIfx had special I/O Processors, which either did DMA, or did
everything, then called the CPU to just do a block transfer. The Q900 &
Q950 used them also. The AV macs, the Q660 and Q840, were the first with
real DMA (which is VERY similar to, or shall we say copied by, the
PowerMac DMA ;-) .

Take care,

Bill