Subject: Re: Headless server -- how to? Q's
To: Michael G. Schabert <mikeride@prez.buf.servtech.com>
From: Dave Mays <dave@fi.edu>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 06/25/1997 10:45:10
On Wed, 25 Jun 1997, Michael G. Schabert wrote:

> >IIRC, the school provides two 10B-T port per dorm room (one per
> >student). Would EtherWave be the way to go in this setup? What would the
> >actual topology be? (Haven't used/seen EtherWave before.)
> 
> That depends on whether your roomie needs his port or not. If both are free
> for you to use, then it'd be a waste to buy the EtherWaves. You could just
> hook up each computer to the network. For home use (i.e. not connected to
> any computers besides the two) you can use a "reversed" ethernet cable.
> This lets you use 10base-T Ethernet without a hub (or the EtherWaves). All
> it does is reverse the send pair and the receive pair on one end of the
> cable so that send on 1 computer goes to receive on the other & vice versa.

The other thing to look out for in this type of situation is that the
school may have the ports locked out in such a fashion that the hubs
they're connected to will not accept multiple devices on one port.
Additional to that is the problem of IPs.  You can't just randomly assign
an ip, even if it's within the appropriate subnet.  This makes network
administrators very mad and vindictive.  You might find that your T-port
is no longer ethernet, and is now a 115v power socket.  Hope that your
roomie doesn't need his port.

If the ports are not set up to limit access to one device, you could buy a
cheapie 5-port e-net hub for about $60.  Maybe less if you look hard.  You
would hook that to the port on your wall, and it would become a repeater,
in essence.  You would then have 4 ports at your disposal.  Then you just
have to find IPs.

> The 7100 is acting as little more than a dumb terminal, while the
> applications are running on the IIci. I'm not sure if the card is required
> for NetBSD to understand color in order to send it to the 7100. Someone
> else said that he didn't think it was required, & I'm not positive. I run
> under internal video on a Quadra 840 AV (B&W only), so I can't test it. If
> I had not just given back my PowerBook, I could have tested it, but oh,
> well. Bottom line is that I'm guessing. Any comments from the real experts
> in port Mac68k?

The video in the machine running the X clients does not matter.  The video
on the X server is what counts.  I had exported color X clients from my
IIsi to my SGI workstation (Over a ppp null-modem, no less) and it was no
problem.

Dave

| Dave Mays                      | dmays@fi.edu                 |
| Computer Systems Specialist    | http://www.fi.edu            |
| The Franklin Institute         | http://www.sln.org           |
| Philadelphia, PA               |                              |