In my case, all I had to do was copy GENERIC to EUNUCHS (the name of my
kernel).  Then edited EUNUCHS to take out the stuff that I didn't need.
The sbc0 line wasn't there by default, however, I just added it anyway and
commentedout the ncrscsi lines and compiled and it worked.  So yes, it
appears that the 1.2.1 distribution source has the sbc code in there.
However, I have no clue if it is recent enough for your needs.  It just
works for my needs (mainly to get rid of an annoying error message).

-me

On Mon, 21 Apr 1997, B. Alex King III wrote:

> I don't do any kernel hacking so I'm confused.  Does the 1.2.1 
> distribution GENERIC kernel contain the sbc scsi driver and just not use 
> it as the default?
> bak
> 
> 
> On Mon, 21 Apr 1997, Mike Eckhoff wrote:
> 
> > I am running SBC on my 1.2.1 kernel without any patches.  Although it
> > isn't in the GENERIC file, you should be able to just add:
> > 
> > sbc0	at obio? flags 0x1
> > 
> > in the config file and the code should alreay be there.  I am faily new to
> > NetBSD, so if I am misunderstanding what you are asking, I apologise.
> > However, this did work for me.
> > 
> > good luck
> > 
> > -me
> > 
> >  +'^'+.,.+'^'+.,.+'^'+.,.+'^'+.,.+'^'+.,.+'^'+.,.+'^'+.,.+'^'+.,.+'^'+.,.+
> > 
> >     Mike Eckhoff / Network Administrator / Wayne Public School District
> >        KB0TPT		 http://www.wayne.esu1.k12.ne.us/~meckhoff/ 
> > 
> > 		"Everyday I relearn something different." -me
> > 
> >  '`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'
> > 
> > 
> 

 +'^'+.,.+'^'+.,.+'^'+.,.+'^'+.,.+'^'+.,.+'^'+.,.+'^'+.,.+'^'+.,.+'^'+.,.+

    Mike Eckhoff / Network Administrator / Wayne Public School District
       KB0TPT		 http://www.wayne.esu1.k12.ne.us/~meckhoff/ 

		"Everyday I relearn something different." -me

 '`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'