On Fri, 14 Mar 1997, Michael R. Zucca wrote:

> >I am running 1.2C (March01) and the only difference with GENERIC in my 
> >config is I commented out "option M68040" (I have a IIvx). I also 
> 
> Don't use sbc with the IIvx. I use ncrscsi and it works just fine. It's also
> a much faster driver than sbc.

This may be a problem. You see, I dont use ncrscsi because it corrupts my 
filesystem every 10 minutes. Now that I've switched to sbc it seems "very 
problematic" as you say. What am I supposed to use then? I'm starting to 
get a bad feeling about this. I cant afford to go buy a new HD right now.

> 
> I recall trying to us an sbc kernel with my IIvx some time ago and it was
> very problematic if I recall correctly.
> 
> >Have people been playing with the sbc driver lately? I remember talk 
> >about video and scsi interrupts conflicting not long ago too.
> 
> It actually turns out that it's not that but possibly a subtle bug somewhere
> in the memory mapping code.
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
>  Michael Zucca - mrz5149@rit.cs.rit.edu - http://www.rit.edu/~mrz5149/
>  "I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose Freewill. "
>   --Rush, Freewill
> _______________________________________________________________________
> 
> 
> 

-----------------------------------------------------------------
"Because user errors often produce unpredictable results, the user
should try to avoid them."

IBM MVS/XA System Programming Library.