Yup.  Compiled with no errors, but I don't think it's *completely* 
happy.  It will routinely show processor usage of > 100% on any given 
process, but other than that, it's the handiest way to kill things.

On Fri, 1 Nov 1996, John Ostrowick wrote:

> i just checked . it only shows what you're running.  duh.  boy do i feel
> stupid now. 
> 
> back to the drawing board...  sigh.. 
> 
> has anyone compiled 'top' for netbsd? this does something useful i want to
> do also: a self updating list of processes that doesn't have to be called
> over and over..
> 
> 

    _/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
     _/   _/ _/   _/ _/   _/  David P. Bushong -- (510) 845-3271         _/
    _/   _/ _/_/_/  _/_/_/   dbushong@cory.eecs.berkeley.edu            _/
   _/   _/ _/      _/   _/  http://www-inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~dbushong_/
_/_/_/_/_/_/      _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/