Subject: Re: ffs, was Disklabel(5)/(8) ??
To: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@loki.stanford.edu>
From: Scott Reynolds <scottr@edsi.org>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 10/11/1996 01:13:47
On Tue, 8 Oct 1996, Bill Studenmund wrote:

> I agree totally with your comment of "meaningless parameters!" These
> optimizations were great when they were implimented, but things have
> changed. But, digressing, couldn't the last cylinder group just not be full?

I don't believe that it does, but it must (obviously) have more sectors in
the group than sectors used for inodes.

--scott