Will *any* serious programs compile without an FPU?  So far, pine failed, 
pico failed, and NCSA HTTPd failed, all with fpu_emulation_type = none 
not recognized errors.

On that note, in trying to compile pico and pine, it regurgitated more 
errors than I can count (4 errors, repeated over and over and over).  
The errors were part of the os specific stuff.  I asked it to build for 
BSD.  Should I have built for A/UX instead?  The errors were warnings 
about conflicting types for built-in functions memcmp, memcpy, strcmp, 
and strcpy.  Also, the system said that pine uses gets(), which is 
unsafe.  Tree :-) questions.  Why is gets unsafe?  If it's unsafe, why is it 
used in Pine?  What problems am I likely to experience using Pine with 
this instruction?

Any suggestions?  If not, does anybody know a site for binaries for this 
stuff?  Waiting 45 minutes for pine and pico to build, only for them to 
fail in the last 30 seconds is pretty ridiculous.  (HTTPd built to the 
crash point in just a few minutes, so that wasn't quite as bad.)

Later,

 /---------------------------------------------------------------------\
|David A. Gatwood             And Richard Cory, one calm summer night,  |
|davagatw@mars              Went home and put a bullet through his head.|
|dgatwood@nyx.cs.du.edu              --Edwin Arlington Robinson         |
|http://mars.utm.edu/~davagatw -or- http://nox.cs.du.edu:8001/~dgatwood |
 \---------------------------------------------------------------------/