Subject: Re: m68k soft float (was illegal instruction)
To: Izumi Tsutsui <email@example.com>
From: Frederick Bruckman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/05/2003 10:48:40
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> In article <Pine.NEB.email@example.com>
> firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > As for future releases, isn't sun2 userland built with -soft-float? If
> > so, it could serve with just a few additions. Then we could have just
> > the two sets of sets, one for m68000 (-m68000 + -msoft-float), and one
> > for m68k (-m68020 or -m68020-40 or -m68020-60).
> sun2 has different MACHINE_ARCH (m68000) and MID_MACHINE (MID_M680002K)
> from other m68k ports (m68k and MID_M68K).
But it's basically the same compiler, with different "specs" (i.e.
different defaults). So if you compile a package with CFLAGS='-m68020
-mno-soft-float' on m68000, you get the same binary as on m68k (no
CFLAGS). Is that not true?