[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: x86 pcitag_t change proposal/patch
On Dec 5, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote:
> Round 2:
> Use more descriptive pcitag_t structure member names and add comment
> I did not change the use of bitfields in pcitag_t because they are not
> used with the hardware.
I still don't like use of bitfields. in 99% of the cases the tag will be or'ed
with the register number and bitfields prevent that.
Main Index |
Thread Index |