[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Sleazy FPU optimization
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 07:44:39PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> 1) Why would using printf for integers need the fpu
va_list processing and on-stack float values.
> 2) a fair number of context switches don't end up in userspace (or
> only return there for a veru short time) doing a full FP save/restore
> on these is likely to be expensive.
I am not saying to always *restore* the FPU. That should be evaluated,
but if the FPU was used, save it.
> 3) I suspect that some programs (like make) hardly ever use the FPU at all,
> but will do a lot of context switches.
If a program doesn't use the FPU, it doesn't need it saved.
Main Index |
Thread Index |