--TG7lY2/6mW/akb80
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 12:50:06PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 12:46:44PM +0100, Quentin Garnier wrote:
> >=20
> > There is one issue:  disabling the acpi device through boot -c doesn't
> > entirely skip ACPI processing.  acpi_probe() is still called, which does
> > execute AML code (going through all the _INI methods).  As a consequenc=
e,
> > mpacpi_scan_apics() might be called too.
>=20
> Is this an issue if we disable ioapic too via boot -c ?

Not for mpacpi_scan_apics (although cpu devices will be attached
according to the MADT).

But initialising all ACPI objects might be an issue.

--=20
Quentin Garnier - cube@cubidou.net - cube@NetBSD.org
"You could have made it, spitting out benchmarks
Owe it to yourself not to fail"
Amplifico, Spitting Out Benchmarks, Hometakes Vol. 2, 2005.

--TG7lY2/6mW/akb80
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBRWRfJtgoQloHrPnoAQKPdQgAllDotQ7RjLRGVZVMk4nMKRnk2kWxmOOm
eDi9geRPmnMB1XN93A3CYlnLY1FX9pdgxYnaBvyHXM0VPsW/Pp4eNCzfGAZYve1i
IhkMQc95h8vjahdiWP+9xLQBBqBPq9eGfcSqoh+uLPoiV7ulYlfLLgnPah/hTvI6
1GttTm9P24RZ9/Xuv41wV4WYTT+zFA/34h3zxvs+QM1ehm6BOJLacC03EsImFMQd
nDj9nPzSgsNOPLvh2ZjZcShHboopXReXkVXgp54+nXH2Cc/+ayLr7Y+38sUcV3kw
qlW4zG+K3VEV47JnC/LcuDmyBqs0jZ59ETbbovLMIyPmOKMuCMQvjQ==
=4u1P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--TG7lY2/6mW/akb80--