Subject: Re: sync i386 pmap with amd64
To: None <abuse@spamalicious.com>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
List: port-i386
Date: 03/18/2006 20:04:11
> hi,
> 
> > > > > 2) Of the "functional" changes, almost all of them conflict heavily (and
> > > > > will almost certainly be replaced by) changes I'm working on to eliminate
> > > > > the "APTD" table completely, which will help both platforms.
> > > >
> > > > there's no way to know about your "local" changes.
> > > > how are you going to eliminate APTD, and how does it conflict,
> > > > and how will it replace the change?
> > > 
> > > I really don't see any need to explain it at this stage.  Suffice it to say 
> > > that essentially every line of code you've touched -- other than gratuitous 
> > > name changes -- is replaced in my code.
> > 
> > does your code really "replace" mine, ie. it also helps to unify pmap code?
> > if so, i have no problem.
> 
> how is it going since then?
> should i still care about conflicts with your local changes?

can you answer?

YAMAMOTO Takashi