Subject: Re: Network drivers in "INSTALL_TINY" (was: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/i386/conf)
To: Matthias Scheler <tron@zhadum.de>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
List: port-i386
Date: 07/05/2005 13:01:26
On Jul 5, 2005, at 12:27 PM, Matthias Scheler wrote:

> # ISA network interfaces
> ate0    at isa? port 0x2a0 irq ?        # AT1700
> #ec0    at isa? port 0x250 iomem 0xd8000 irq 9    # 3Com 3c503  
> Ethernet
> #eg0    at isa? port 0x280 irq 9        # 3C505 ethernet cards
> #el0    at isa? port 0x300 irq 9        # 3C501 ethernet cards
> ep0    at isa? port ? irq ?            # 3C509 ethernet cards
> ef0    at isa? port 0x360 iomem 0xd0000 irq 7    # 3C507

I would say 3c507 (ef) is less common than 3c503 (ec).  AT1700 (ate)  
and FMV-180 (fmv) probably aren't that common, either.  Same with  
StarLAN (ai).

> ai0    at isa? port 0x360 iomem 0xd0000 irq 7    # StarLAN
> fmv0    at isa? port 0x2a0 irq ?        # FMV-180 series
> ix0    at isa? port 0x300 irq 10        # EtherExpress/16
> iy0    at isa? port 0x360 irq ?        # EtherExpress PRO 10 ISA
> lc0    at isa? port 0x320 iomem ? irq ?    # DEC EtherWORKS III  
> (LEMAC)
> #depca0    at isa? port 0x300 iomem 0xc8000 iosiz 0x8000 irq 5    #  
> DEPCA
> #le*    at depca?
> #nele0    at isa? port 0x320 irq 9 drq 7        # NE2100
> #le*    at nele?
> #bicc0    at isa? port 0x320 irq 10 drq 7        # BICC IsoLan
> #le*    at bicc?
> ne0    at isa? port 0x280 irq 9        # NE[12]000 ethernet cards
> ne1    at isa? port 0x300 irq 10
> sm0    at isa? port 0x300 irq 10        # SMC91C9x Ethernet
> we0    at isa? port 0x280 iomem 0xd0000 irq 9    # WD/SMC Ethernet
> we1    at isa? port 0x300 iomem 0xcc000 irq 10
>
> Which of these should be commented out insted of ec(4)?
>
>     Kind regards
>
> -- 
> Matthias Scheler                                  http://scheler.de/ 
> ~matthias/
>

-- thorpej