Subject: Re: "mbrlabel" weirdness - bug or feature?
To: Alec Muffett <alecm@crypticide.com>
From: David Laight <david@l8s.co.uk>
List: port-i386
Date: 02/18/2005 19:04:43
> ...but look at that last entry! The one for partition "f"!
> It's tiny!
> 
> The diags at the top of the command tell you that the command
> knows the partition is 20457MB in size, but the entry that
> "mbrlabel" would write for it that would be written to the
> disklabel would be way undersized.
> 
> Does anyone know what's going on, please? Is this a bug, or a
> feature? Or am I just plain wrong?

Looks like a bug - maybe some code is trying to use byte offsets!

	David

-- 
David Laight: david@l8s.co.uk