Subject: Re: APM *and* ACPI or is it APM *or* ACPI?
To: <>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@theory.cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: port-i386
Date: 02/11/2003 13:34:13
--OQhbRXNHSL5w/5po
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:08:16PM +1100, BlueAgent wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:04:28AM +0100, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 10:47:08PM -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> >=20
> > > What you'll need to do is to execute the appropriate ACPI method to
> > > assure that the fan is turned on when ACPI gets an event indicating
> > > that the temperature has gotten too high. See section 12 of the ACPI
> > > manual.
> >=20
> > Yet another stupid design decision in PC hardware. Fans should auto-swi=
tch
> > on when the temperature is too high. Implemented in hardware. I guess we
> > can't circumvent this? (Other than keeping the fan always running)
>=20
> I guess there should be some way to circumvent this, Windows seems to
> be able to control fan speed on my brand new HP Pavilion 724a.

That was not what I was talking about. I was talking about setting the
hardware to auto-control the fan without depending on the OS not being
crashed. I know we should be able to control the fan from within NetBSD.

Regards,
	Ignatios

--OQhbRXNHSL5w/5po
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBPkjtoTCn4om+4LhpAQGviAf+MrO0YW6VUmD72Yfk9iY72rq9JjU8bCWw
jutG+vFxHtMt5E4RmmZT3mCsm7MjqwxQg9XrQN4ur0l5Xa2gzoVbeMK0kgvVhHCK
HO5j823I1EJdEWLCZBFu3eGQTrsbZfYI+nFLs+aAB0BG49atKMCoaFOxzVIZjYT1
9FDnIu6gAER5MpwAfkuZFA5+ag2W7K3G/V6r3rERb3knKfRz96lqKBCCH3McBs1P
Ai5ZOLyiY4ZC8jlKblH6tPMewDj44rMVddBQeZONtE+gBaKTNVg79qMAOlXW4RpN
mG4jsf8EXF7xRUIqSna88Ir7VV+Do9w0AHfFKeZWILv7QQ/dq2k2dQ==
=UTgN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--OQhbRXNHSL5w/5po--