Subject: Re: Odd performance issue with 'su'
To: None <explorer@flame.org>
From: David Burgess <burgess@neonramp.com>
List: port-i386
Date: 12/09/2002 17:37:17
Thanks - I'll get the rest of the systems set up for Kerberos and see if
that helps.

Dave

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> "David Burgess" <burgess@neonramp.com> writes:
>
>> On a couple of the machines, for no reason that I can fathom, the 'su'
>> command takes up to 90 seconds to respond with a 'password:' response.
>>  Specifically, it happens most often on the primary mail server in the
>> mail cluster, but on other machines as well.  The problem comes and
>> goes, but is definitely worse since I started the 1.6 upgrade.
>
> I suspect it's doing some sort of magic behind-the-scenes kerberos 5
> server discovery.
>
> - --Michael
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)
> Comment: See http://www.flame.org/~explorer/pgp for my keys
>
> iD8DBQE99Sh/l6Nz7kJWYWYRAv+4AJ9Mc0ocRz8pph6JF6QSuR5lHRmfrwCfeSkK
> V4lhCKCl/GjbPd92OxC4vhI=
> =AFJi
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
Dave Burgess
CTO, Nebraska On-Ramp
Chief Engineer, Mitec Internet Services
Bellevue, NE 68123