Subject: Re: Odd performance issue with 'su'
To: David Burgess <burgess@neonramp.com>
From: Michael Graff <explorer@flame.org>
List: port-i386
Date: 12/09/2002 15:34:23
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

"David Burgess" <burgess@neonramp.com> writes:

> On a couple of the machines, for no reason that I can fathom, the 'su'
> command takes up to 90 seconds to respond with a 'password:' response. 
> Specifically, it happens most often on the primary mail server in the mail
> cluster, but on other machines as well.  The problem comes and goes, but
> is definitely worse since I started the 1.6 upgrade.

I suspect it's doing some sort of magic behind-the-scenes kerberos 5
server discovery.

- --Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)
Comment: See http://www.flame.org/~explorer/pgp for my keys

iD8DBQE99Sh/l6Nz7kJWYWYRAv+4AJ9Mc0ocRz8pph6JF6QSuR5lHRmfrwCfeSkK
V4lhCKCl/GjbPd92OxC4vhI=
=AFJi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----