On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Andy R wrote:

> > > Is this patch in 1.6?
> >
> > This patch isn't in _anything_ yet, the bug is still
> > in the "open" state.
> > I certainly hope it gets included in 1.6, seems
> > rather serious to me.
> >
> > Rick
>
> I haven't done your recreate of this problem, but I've
> always been on 1.5.x. I'm pretty sure I was at 1.5.2
> when the corruption occurred. Is this applicable? I'm
> at 1.5.3_RC2 now...

I don't think UBC was ever integrated into 1.5.x, so this might not be
your problem afterall.

Rick