On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 08:59:10PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 08:57:08PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > I guess because vt100 is known on most unix system, when wsvt25 is not ?
> 
> But that can't be the reason to set the terminal type to something
> sub-optimal, can it?
> 
> [E.g. the function keys won't work with TERM=vt100.]

Did you try vt220 ?
With vt220 I get escape sequences for functions keys, which looks good.

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
--