On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 03:28:30PM +0000, Andrea wrote:
> SOrry if i bugs you again,but it seem that you are well informed about
> LFS:)

I just read sources-changes :)

> 
> Do you know the actual status of lfsV2?

It shouldn't be worse than V1 :) But there is still the problem between 
UBC and LFS in -current, which prevent mmap from working on LFS ... quite
annoying.

> Which are the problems in LFSv1 you talked about?

In v1 a timestamp is used to find the last log, if rollback is needed.
This can be a problem is the time of day is adjusted backward.
v2 solves this by using a private number which can't decrease.

--
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
--