Subject: Re: mk.conf and "I387_LIBM"
To: Chris Baird <cjb@brushtail.apana.org.au>
From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@orchard.arlington.ma.us>
List: port-i386
Date: 10/22/2000 11:59:38 
> Is there any reason the port doesn't use this by default?
> (Particularly with FPUs being IEEE754/854.) At the very least,
> I387_LIBM should be documented somewhere (aside from the 1.3-1.4
> ChangeLog).

This is fixed in NetBSD 1.5 (now entering beta); on the i386 port,
ld.so.conf contains a directive to load libm387.so.0 "in front of"
libm.so.0 if the hardware supports an FPU.

						- Bill