OK, the K6 was 13x faster than the dx2-66.

(this is approximate, based on real, user, and system times; the ratio is
 pretty much the same for each of those times.)

-mac


On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Jukka Marin wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 11:30:08AM -0700, Mike Cheponis wrote:
> > My experience here is that a 32 MB 486-dx2/66 w/1G SCSI disk (waaaaaay faster
> > than that 386sx) was more than 13x slower than the $178 K6-2/450
> 
> Hmm, lessee.. "1x slower" means "zero speed", so "13x slower" means the
> 486 was running backwards at 12x the speed of the K6-2?  :-)
> 
>   -jm
>