Jason Thorpe writes:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 1998 09:55:13 -0500 
>  "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> wrote:
> 
>  > My problem is that I actually run my snapshots for a while before
>  > releasing them to make sure they don't totally destroy people's
>  > machines, and right now I'm running UVM. Backing out would be painful
>  > because the userlands differ. (Indeed, you need a different userland
>  > for UVM *and* PMAP_NEW, too!)
>  > 
>  > Given this, I'm only really in a position to produce UVM snapshots. I
>  > was going to do a new one in about two weeks (once the rubble finished
>  > bouncing).
> 
> What are you talking about?  Build with a different mk.conf and
> BSDOBJDIR, then!

As I said:

I actually run my snapshots for a while before releasing them to make
sure they really work. I feel it isn't really "nice" to put out a
snapshot I myself haven't run. All my machines right now run UVM. If
you feel no UVM snapshots should be built, I suppose I won't be able
to build a snapshot for a while.

> The fact that _you're_ running UVM should have no effect on your
> ability to make regular snapshots.

Sure it does. I won't put out a snapshot that I haven't run. It could
screw someone particularly badly, so I don't put up untested stuff.

Perry