Subject: Re: cpp problem when compiling kernel
To: Mark Andres <mark@giganet.net>
From: Tom I Helbekkmo <tih@Hamartun.Priv.NO>
List: port-i386
Date: 02/08/1998 13:09:26
On Sun, 8 Feb 1998, Mark Andres wrote:

> Thank you greatly for the excellent advice. I am borrowing the HP Vectra
> while I gradually build my own PC over the next month or so. It came with
> 16MB of RAM and I could have sworn it was 60ns.  I added two 32MB SIMMs
> that were also 60ns. Well, it turns out the original SIMMs were 70ns.
> Once I popped them out, the problems disappeared.

Just to clear up the ambiguity here: you did remove the _old_ SIMMs,
right?  The 70ns ones?  I just don't want anyone to get the wrong
impression, and end up thinking that higher numbers are better here.
The number gives the response time of the chips in nanoseconds, so a
lower number means a faster chip.  No offense intended, but it could
easily seem the other way around from what you wrote...  :-)

-tih
-- 
Popularity is the hallmark of mediocrity.  --Niles Crane, "Frasier"