Subject: Re: > 64 Mb machines running -current?
To: None <frank@fwi.uva.nl, thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
From: Wolfgang Solfrank <ws@kurt.tools.de>
List: port-i386
Date: 12/07/1996 18:46:35
> Then again, there are some ports that can live with the change, and
> don't suffer from this problem. I'm tempted to replace the change
> to MAXBSIZE I made with a default to 16k, but allow ports with a lot
> of KVA space to make it larger.
I still would prefer a default of MAXPHYS and let ports overwrite with a
smaller MAXBSIZE if they need it. After all, the necessity to limit it
to 16k is the bug, isn't it?
--
ws@TooLs.DE (Wolfgang Solfrank, TooLs GmbH) +49-228-985800