In message <29256.832785329@UX2.SP.CS.CMU.EDU>, you write:
>Only think KGDB loses is if you have only one system, and so don't
>have another machine on which you can run the debugger...

	This is why the best case is to have both options available.

>> Has any thought
>> gone into changing that? (i.e., was it ripped out, or just nobody
>> bothered because DDB was considered a better use of effort?)
>
>I think it's more like: "KGDB was never really completely integrated
>into the NetBSD i386 code, and has slowly fallen into complete
>disrepair."
>
>At the time the project started, the machine-dependent bits weren't
>available, as I recall.  Apparently nobody has had the
>time+inclination to make them work now that they are available (as
>part of Lite2).

	Hopefully this will change.

								-Craig