Subject: Re: NetBSD/hp300 webpages
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Steve Peurifoy <email@example.com>
Date: 01/20/1998 23:39:48
> (Presumably this is PR 3769).
That would be the one.
> Hmm - can someone say _why_ this can't be commited, or at least
> added as a kernel option?
It's a mystery to me. Certainly leaving the timeout as is doesn't
render the code any cleaner than changing it to a more reasonable value.
In looking at the PR database just now, I see that PR 4765 describes an
ffs_valloc() panic during heavy fs activity to a ST34555. Deja vu.
I'd be willing to bet $20 right now that it's the same problem.