Subject: Re: Building a new kernel for a 345
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Brian J. Fox <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/29/1995 12:06:46
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 1995 08:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Eduardo E. Horvath email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: Herb Peyerl <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Wed, 28 Jun 1995, 'Most Excellent' Eric Mehlhaff wrote:
> Herb Peyerl <firstname.lastname@example.org> recently wrote:
> >"Eduardo E. Horvath email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > 1) I have been trying to build a new kernel for an hp-9000/345. The new
> > > kernel boots, but as soon as I go into multi-user mode I get a panic
> >There are a lot of panic() calls in the kernel. Unfortunately, it's
> >difficult to diagnose your problem without knowing where the kernel
> I just want to say I have similar problems trying to boot up a
> hp-9000/350 on kernels compiled from current tarballs. I've tracked it
> down to right where /etc/rc does the mount -nonfs (just after fsck).
While this is rather interesting, I'm trying to get a 1.0 kernel to work,
not a -current. I finally have some info on the panic (I usually get two
of them so the first scrolls off the screen):
trap type=2 code=0 v=0
pid=24 pc=000051ea ps=2000
sfc = 0001 dfc=0001
followed, of course, by the manditory register dump and stack dump.
I was hoping that someone would tell me that this is a well known problem
with a simple fix.
I'm going to try to compile the INSTALL kernel and see how that fares.
Turn off all forms of debugging in the config. Rebuild from the 1.0
Don't ask me why, but it worked for me.