Subject: Re: Dynamic linking is go (again)
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Valeriy E. Ushakov <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/08/2003 05:40:10
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 01:09:31 +0400, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 03:27:17 +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > Just FYI, groff build will fail due to (probably) gcc-3.3 vs
> > old libstdc++ incompatibility.
> Interesting thing is that, IIRC, groff does not really need libstdc++,
> but our bsd.prog.mk adds it for all PROG_CXX programs (cf. bsd.prog.mk).
> Last time I looked (admittedly, a looong time ago), groff was written
> in, effectively, "c with classes".
Ah, apparently it's still true, only with gcc-3.3 it now needs
-lsupc++, that, as I understand, *any* c++ program compiled with
email@example.com | Zu Grunde kommen
http://www.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/ | Ist zu Grunde gehen