>>2) There's something fishy in DREAMS.LANA.  I'll try to track
>>   down the exact option causing the problem over the next few
>>   days.
>
>There is s/th fishy you're right. If you remember one of my last mails
>about an assertion failure in the kernel, this went away when I tried a
>simple GENERIC with the lana line.

One thing I forgot to mention yesterday, which makes things again a
bit more strange:
I don't see those file corruptions with the DREAMS.LANA config...

regards,
chris