I don't know where you get that confirmation, I own a CacheRaQ2 a
Cobalt RaQ, and a Cobalt RaQ 2, the interfaces on all of these units
are 100mbps.

Regards

On 25/08/07, Andreas Fuchs <fox@tcnet.ch> wrote:
> Jim
>
> As far as i know the main difference is the Ethernet ports, the Qube2
> and the Raq's have 10MB interfaces and the Cache Raq has 100MB ethernet
> ports. That's also the reason why the Restore CD was'nt working. Don't
> know about the 4.0b CD if there is any difference.
>
> regards
> Andreas
>
> James Hartley schrieb:
> > Attempting to flesh out some of the information in the FAQ, I ran into
> > the following through Google:
> >
> > http://www.st.ryukoku.ac.jp/~kjm/report/N+I-99-Tokyo/RaQ.jpg
> >
> > Does anyone know the difference between the RaQ & CacheRaQ?  It
> > appears to only be a difference in supplied software, but where I
> > found this information was hazy at best...
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Jim
> >
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------
> Andreas Fuchs
> Allmend 31
> 3504 Niederh=FCnigen
>
> P: 031 792 04 34
> N: 078 740 93 80
> M: fox@tcnet.ch
> W: www.aironaut.ch
>
>
>