Hi,

         Using 2.0 v1 - and very good it is too!!! Ta for the comments on=20
the website, hopefully I won't have to change too much to make it 2.0=20
compatible ;-)

Kind Regards,
Pete.

At 18:07 09/03/2005, Claudio Leiva S wrote:
>Hi:
>
>Only one question, did you use de version 2.0 or 2.0-v1??, and I have to=20
>say thanks to you for your guide to install NetBSD in a Qube.... thanks.
>
>
>
>Claudio Leiva
>Las Vegas, Nevada
>USA
>http://nv4x4.no-ip.org/claudio
>
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Pete Rushmere" <pete@rushmere.org>
>To: <port-cobalt@netbsd.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 9:59 AM
>Subject: I keep forgetting....
>
>
>.... to CC to this group!!!
>
>Firstly, a big thanks and a "well done" to Alex for his efforts... top guy!
>
>Finally got around to installing 2.0 and works a treat - Qube2, 64MB etc...
>
>Two errors I picked out of dmesg:
>
>Loading: wd0a:netbsd
>2500768+252384 [85488+76831]=3D0x2c7f6c
>Starting at 0x80001000
>
>invalid bootinfo (standalone boot?)
>[ Kernel symbol table missing! ]
>
>Is this important / what is it?
>
>And,
>
>paneld[543]: cannot attach to device hd44780, node /dev/lcd
>
>The thing about the panel is it's the only way I can keep track of who has
>which IP - is there a quick fix?
>
>Looking forward to getting 2.0 on the Teraqube and see if the Promise
>driver makes any improvement.
>
>One final thing - packages. Can't seem to find any for 2.0 - bash, perl
>etc. Will 1.6.1 pkg work or am I doomed to compile?
>
>Kind Regards,
>Pete.
>
>So when someone comes and begs for you to "fix their PC", tell them it's a
>=A31,000 flat fee.
>They'll say: "But I can buy another PC for less than that!"
>And you reply: "Excellent! You do that. Now leave me in peace!"
>
>
>
>
>