Subject: Re: UPDATE: various changes on INSTALL and iso generation
To: Nick Hudson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Manuel Bouyer <email@example.com>
Date: 03/09/2007 18:15:35
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 07:42:09AM +0000, Nick Hudson wrote:
> On Thursday 08 March 2007 23:41, Chris Gilbert wrote:
> > Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > > [ relevant port lists in Cc; please reply to one port list or
> > > tech-install as appropriate]
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 05:49:00PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >> here's an updated patch for my changes on iso generation. Changes since
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > so I just commited this (with some minor changes thanks to Alan Barrett's
> > > comments). The iso should be bootable on:
> > > alpha, amd64, cats, i386, pmax, sgimips, sparc, sparc64, sun3, vax.
> > > You can find an iso for these ports (exept cats which doesn't build at
> > > all right now), built using build.sh iso-image with the new
> > > infrastructure. It would be great if each of these could be tested at
> > > last once. I tested amd64, i386, alpha and sparc64 myself.
> > I'll try and take a look at the cats failure this weekend. I wasn't
> > aware that it wasn't building. I thought I'd fixed any kernel fall out
> > from caddr_t last weekend. I guess it's something else.
> It just built for me from sources 8th Mar around 10:00UTC. The CD doesn't boot
> as it appears to provide an ELF kernel and I'm still using cyclone.
well, AFAIK I used the same logic as in etc/ to make the CD bootable.
But maybe I overlooked something ...
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI. Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference