[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: bootloader issue
I know I've attempted to modify this setting when I was using 1.6.1 and the
results weren't good, so I'm a little nervious to touch it on the TT030 if
no problems are being observed.
Maybe you could leave the ATARITT kernel as-is, if ST_POOL_SIZE hasn't
already been modified there?
In any case, I can test any proposed changes on my TT030.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Brownlee" <abs%absd.org@localhost>
Cc: <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>; "David Brownlee" <abs%netbsd.org@localhost>;
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 7:21 AM
Subject: Re: bootloader issue
From: T. Makinen <tjamaloo%gmail.com@localhost>
I guess that pool exhausting should not be problem with Falcon if SCSI
not used... So I'm not sure how useful ST_POOL_SIZE tuning is for Falcon.
Anyway TT kernel is using DMA and it might be affected by ST_POOL_SIZE
I don't know if it's good safety measurement to leave it to 24 and pull
also to NetBSD-4. What do others think ?
I would sync them all to 24 for now.
Main Index |
Thread Index |