On Mon, 21 May 2001, Chris Gilbert wrote:

> hmm, what revision of SA is it?  If you check dmesg it'll say somewhere (just
> to rule out the J/K SA bugs.

It claims to be the SA-110 with the STM^ bug.

> oh what does trace (or is it backtrace or bt) say?  you might have to boot
> the kernel with symbol table enabled.

Well I just managed to trigger it again (with top running this time...
30% CPU time used by cvs, 4% user, 22% system, 11% interrupt, 24M RAM
free. This time I'd tried disabling swap to see if that made a difference,
but it didn't.

trace gives (typed from the screen)
_cpu_Debugger
_panic
_data_abort_handler
_hardclock
_clockhandler
_biowait
_bread
_ffs_blkatoff
_ufs_lookup
_lookup
_namei
_sys___lstat13
_syscall

-- 
Gillette - the best a man can forget