Subject: Re: New bootconfig structure proposal
To: None <imago@kabel065011.kabel.utwente.nl>
From: Chris Cowdery <chris@cowdery.demon.co.uk>
List: port-arm32
Date: 02/17/2001 11:30:27
In message <Pine.NEB.4.30.0102170056060.12690-100000@rangerover.kasbah>
          Reinoud Zandijk <imago@kabel065011.kabel.utwente.nl> wrote:

> Hi Chris,
> 
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Chris Gilbert wrote:
> > > Well .... yes.... but is it really favourable ? I mean ... you have to run
> > > a newly build kernel to do that anyway so why not use the new bootloader
> > > then ?
> >
> > Failsafe mechanism?  The new bootloader is still under testing and
> > development.
> 
> In a way yes... but on the other hand it is known to work now on all
> platforms the old one worked on and more except one RO 3.7 case but i've
> modified my bootloader for that (not tested yet by him yet though).

Presumably me :-)

Where can I get it!

-- 
   ________         _         ______                  __               
  / ____/ /_  _____(_)____   / ____/___ _      ______/ /__  _______  __
 / /   / __ \/ ___/ / ___/  / /   / __ \ | /| / / __  / _ \/ ___/ / / /
/ /___/ / / / /  / (__  )  / /___/ /_/ / |/ |/ / /_/ /  __/ /  / /_/ / 
\____/_/ /_/_/  /_/____/   \____/\____/|__/|__/\__,_/\___/_/   \__, /  
                                                              /____/   
http://www.cowdery.demon.co.uk/