On Monday 12 February 2001 10:38 pm, Reinoud Zandijk wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Chris Gilbert wrote:
> > Yes this is what I'm basing it on, your description of the kinetic
> > support suggested you were doing something identical to me, just in a
> > different place.  Without the following code it's as stable as a rock,
> > suggesting something needs to use the SIMM ram.
>
> <snip>
>
> Sounds very similar yeah :)) but there are some small differences ...
> hmm...  i'll see if i can put in the memory classification but i dont how
> really for i can't change the pmap interface really.

I don't believe that it'll be light work to do that, however I'd planned to 
scope it out.  That's why for now I'm running a slower kernel, I don't trust 
the fast one not to die in a make build.

Cheers,
Chris